2008 Mazda 3 vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC60 (296 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2008 Mazda 3. (257 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda 3.
Because 2013 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo XC60 (441 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 3. (380 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Volvo XC60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda 3 | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 3 | XC60 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 3000 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 6 valves |
Horse Power | 257 HP | 296 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 380 Nm | 441 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 93 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.1 seconds | 8.9 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4627 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1891 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1713 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2774 mm |