2008 Mazda 5 vs. 1982 Renault 9
To start off, 2008 Mazda 5 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 9 would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 5 (153 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1982 Renault 9. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda 5 weights approximately 510 kg more than 1982 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda 5 | 1982 Renault 9 | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 5 | 9 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.2:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1332 kg | 822 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.9 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 38 L |