2008 Mazda 5 vs. 1995 Nissan CQ-X
To start off, 2008 Mazda 5 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Nissan CQ-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Nissan CQ-X would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda 5 weights approximately 623 kg more than 1995 Nissan CQ-X.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1995 Nissan CQ-X has automatic transmission and 2008 Mazda 5 has manual transmission. 2008 Mazda 5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Nissan CQ-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda 5 | 1995 Nissan CQ-X | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | 5 | CQ-X |
Year Released | 2008 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 196 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 852 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2530 mm |