2008 Mazda 5 vs. 1995 Nissan CQ-X
To start off, 2008 Mazda 5 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Nissan CQ-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Nissan CQ-X would be higher. Both 2008 Mazda 5 and 1995 Nissan CQ-X are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda 5 weights approximately 758 kg more than 1995 Nissan CQ-X.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1995 Nissan CQ-X has automatic transmission and 2008 Mazda 5 has manual transmission. 2008 Mazda 5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Nissan CQ-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mazda 5 | 1995 Nissan CQ-X | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | 5 | CQ-X |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 852 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2530 mm |
