2008 Mazda 5 vs. 2004 Suzuki Aerio
To start off, 2008 Mazda 5 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Suzuki Aerio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Suzuki Aerio would be higher. At 2,294 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Suzuki Aerio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Suzuki Aerio (155 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2008 Mazda 5. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Suzuki Aerio should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda 5 weights approximately 171 kg more than 2004 Suzuki Aerio.
Because 2004 Suzuki Aerio is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mazda 5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Suzuki Aerio will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Suzuki Aerio (206 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 5. (165 Nm). This means 2004 Suzuki Aerio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda 5 | 2004 Suzuki Aerio | |
Make | Mazda | Suzuki |
Model | 5 | Aerio |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 2294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 206 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1304 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.9 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 50 L |