2008 Mazda 5 vs. 2005 Smart Coupe
To start off, 2008 Mazda 5 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Smart Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Smart Coupe would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 5 (153 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 2005 Smart Coupe. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 2005 Smart Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda 5 weights approximately 602 kg more than 2005 Smart Coupe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 5 (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Smart Coupe. (95 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Smart Coupe. 2005 Smart Coupe has automatic transmission and 2008 Mazda 5 has manual transmission. 2008 Mazda 5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Smart Coupe will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mazda 5 | 2005 Smart Coupe | |
| Make | Mazda | Smart |
| Model | 5 | Coupe |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 2299 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 201 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1332 kg | 730 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 1820 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.9 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 33 L |
