2008 Mazda 6 vs. 1959 Triumph Herald

To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 6 (148 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1959 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1959 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda 6 weights approximately 596 kg more than 1959 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1959 Triumph Herald is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Triumph Herald. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 6 (184 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Triumph Herald.

Compare all specifications:

2008 Mazda 6 1959 Triumph Herald
Make Mazda Triumph
Model 6 Herald
Year Released 2008 1959
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1999 cc 1145 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 148 HP 38 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 4500 RPM
Torque 184 Nm 83 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 2250 RPM
Engine Bore Size 87.5 mm 69.3 mm
Engine Stroke Size 83.1 mm 76 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.8:1 8.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1356 kg 760 kg
Vehicle Length 4680 mm 3890 mm
Vehicle Width 1440 mm 1530 mm
Vehicle Height 1790 mm 1310 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2330 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 29 L