2008 Mazda 6 vs. 1963 Wartburg 312
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda 6 weights approximately 424 kg more than 1963 Wartburg 312.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 6 (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Wartburg 312. (81 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda 6 | 1963 Wartburg 312 | |
Make | Mazda | Wartburg |
Model | 6 | 312 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 36 HP |
Torque | 207 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 6.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1384 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 43 L |