2008 Mazda 6 vs. 1964 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda 6 weights approximately 299 kg more than 1964 Nissan Cedric.
Because 1964 Nissan Cedric is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Nissan Cedric will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 6 (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mazda 6 | 1964 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | 6 | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 60 HP |
| Torque | 207 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1384 kg | 1085 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2540 mm |
