2008 Mazda 6 vs. 1964 Seat 600
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 6 (104 HP) has 80 more horse power than 1964 Seat 600. (24 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1964 Seat 600.
Because 1964 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 6 (145 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Seat 600. (47 Nm). This means 2008 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda 6 | 1964 Seat 600 | |
Make | Mazda | Seat |
Model | 6 | 600 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 767 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 24 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 47 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2010 mm |