2008 Mazda 6 vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,261 cc, 2008 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 6 (156 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda 6 weights approximately 214 kg more than 1964 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 6 (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda 6 | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Mazda | Triumph |
Model | 6 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 1998 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 207 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1384 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 64 L |