2008 Mazda 6 vs. 1965 NSU Autonova
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 NSU Autonova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 NSU Autonova would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda 6 weights approximately 619 kg more than 1965 NSU Autonova.
Because 1965 NSU Autonova is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 NSU Autonova. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mazda 6 | 1965 NSU Autonova | |
| Make | Mazda | NSU |
| Model | 6 | Autonova |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2261 cc | 1085 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.6 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 66.6 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1354 kg | 735 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1210 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2260 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 37 L |
