2008 Mazda 6 vs. 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 would be higher. At 2,778 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 (258 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 6. (207 Nm). This means 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mazda 6 | 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 | |
| Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 6 | 280 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2261 cc | 2778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 180 HP |
| Torque | 207 Nm | 258 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.6 mm | 86.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 78.7 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2410 mm |
