2008 Mazda 6 vs. 1973 Rover P5B
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Rover P5B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Rover P5B would be higher. At 3,526 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Rover P5B is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Rover P5B (158 HP) has 54 more horse power than 2008 Mazda 6. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Rover P5B should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda 6.
Because 1973 Rover P5B is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Rover P5B. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Rover P5B (295 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 1973 Rover P5B will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mazda 6 | 1973 Rover P5B | |
| Make | Mazda | Rover |
| Model | 6 | P5B |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1973 |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 3526 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 158 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 295 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2820 mm |
