2008 Mazda 6 vs. 1975 Zastava 132
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2008 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 6 (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1975 Zastava 132. (107 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1975 Zastava 132.
Because 1975 Zastava 132 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Zastava 132. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 6 (177 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Zastava 132. (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda 6 | 1975 Zastava 132 | |
Make | Mazda | Zastava |
Model | 6 | 132 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1975 |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1756 cc |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 107 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 177 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2560 mm |