2008 Mazda 6 vs. 1977 Zastava 132

To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 2,261 cc, 2008 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 6 (156 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1977 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1977 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda 6 weights approximately 289 kg more than 1977 Zastava 132. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1977 Zastava 132 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Zastava 132. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 6 (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Zastava 132. (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Zastava 132.

Compare all specifications: