2008 Mazda 6 vs. 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW would be higher. At 6,328 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW (395 HP) has 291 more horse power than 2008 Mazda 6. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda 6.
Because 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW (600 Nm) has 455 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda 6 | 1979 Mercedes-Benz CW | |
Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 6 | CW |
Year Released | 2008 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 6328 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 395 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 600 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1120 mm |