2008 Mazda 6 vs. 1982 Holden Camira
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Holden Camira would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Holden Camira is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 6 (104 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1982 Holden Camira. (86 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Holden Camira.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 6 (145 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Holden Camira. (125 Nm). This means 2008 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Holden Camira.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mazda 6 | 1982 Holden Camira | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | 6 | Camira |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 86 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 125 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2580 mm |
