2008 Mazda 6 vs. 1983 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Toyota Celica (106 HP) has 2 more horse power than 2008 Mazda 6. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda 6.
Because 1983 Toyota Celica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Toyota Celica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Toyota Celica (147 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 1983 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda 6 | 1983 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | 6 | Celica |
Year Released | 2008 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 147 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 77 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2510 mm |