2008 Mazda 6 vs. 1983 Volvo 240
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 6 (212 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1983 Volvo 240. (122 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1983 Volvo 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Volvo 240 weights approximately 118 kg more than 2008 Mazda 6.
Because 1983 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 6 (267 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Volvo 240. (170 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda 6 | 1983 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 6 | 240 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 2127 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 212 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 267 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1192 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2660 mm |