2008 Mazda 6 vs. 1987 Mitsubishi HSR-V
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Mitsubishi HSR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Mitsubishi HSR-V would be higher.
Because 1987 Mitsubishi HSR-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 Mitsubishi HSR-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mazda 6 | 1987 Mitsubishi HSR-V | |
| Make | Mazda | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 6 | HSR-V |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1987 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Horse Power | 156 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
