2008 Mazda 6 vs. 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,351 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 6 (264 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (197 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 156 kg more than 2008 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 6 (380 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (291 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda 6 | 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
Model | 6 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2008 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 3351 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 264 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 380 Nm | 291 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1354 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2740 mm |