2008 Mazda 6 vs. 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 6 (104 HP) has 53 more horse power than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 6 (145 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. (89 Nm). This means 2008 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mazda 6 | 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D | |
| Make | Mazda | Rover |
| Model | 6 | 100 1.4 D |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1358 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 51 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 89 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 70.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 81.3 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1380 mm |
