2008 Mazda 6 vs. 1994 Rover 400
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 400 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Rover 400 (109 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2008 Mazda 6. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Rover 400 should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 145 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mazda 6 | 1994 Rover 400 | |
| Make | Mazda | Rover |
| Model | 6 | 400 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1590 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 109 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 80.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 79 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2560 mm |
