2008 Mazda 6 vs. 1996 Proton 400
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 400 would be higher. At 2,261 cc, 2008 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 6 (156 HP) has 89 more horse power than 1996 Proton 400. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda 6 weights approximately 269 kg more than 1996 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 6 (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Proton 400. (123 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda 6 | 1996 Proton 400 | |
Make | Mazda | Proton |
Model | 6 | 400 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 207 Nm | 123 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1384 kg | 1115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2510 mm |