2008 Mazda 6 vs. 1998 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 75 would be higher. At 1,993 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Rover 75 (111 HP) has 7 more horse power than 2008 Mazda 6. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Rover 75 (260 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 1998 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda 6 | 1998 Rover 75 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | 6 | 75 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 111 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 260 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 88 mm |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.3 seconds | 13.2 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 66 L |