2008 Mazda 6 vs. 1999 Rover 25
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Rover 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Rover 25 would be higher. At 2,261 cc, 2008 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 6 (156 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1999 Rover 25. (103 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1999 Rover 25. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda 6 weights approximately 354 kg more than 1999 Rover 25. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 6 (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Rover 25. (138 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Rover 25.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda 6 | 1999 Rover 25 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | 6 | 25 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 1588 cc |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 103 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 207 Nm | 138 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1384 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 50 L |