2008 Mazda 6 vs. 2000 Tata E
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Tata E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Tata E would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Tata E is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Tata E weights approximately 76 kg more than 2008 Mazda 6.
Because 2000 Tata E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Tata E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Tata E (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 6. (184 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Tata E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda 6 | 2000 Tata E | |
Make | Mazda | Tata |
Model | 6 | E |
Year Released | 2008 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 184 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1294 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2810 mm |