2008 Mazda 6 vs. 2002 Morgan 4
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Morgan 4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Morgan 4 (112 HP) has 8 more horse power than 2008 Mazda 6. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Morgan 4 should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda 6.
Because 2002 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Morgan 4 (160 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 2002 Morgan 4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda 6 | 2002 Morgan 4 | |
Make | Mazda | Morgan |
Model | 6 | 4 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 112 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 160 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 50 L |