2008 Mazda 6 vs. 2003 Opel Omega
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Opel Omega (142 HP) has 38 more horse power than 2008 Mazda 6. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda 6.
Because 2003 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Opel Omega (209 Nm) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 2003 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda 6 | 2003 Opel Omega | |
Make | Mazda | Opel |
Model | 6 | Omega |
Year Released | 2008 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 142 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 209 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 94.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 75 L |