2008 Mazda 6 vs. 2006 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Rover 75 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Rover 75 (175 HP) has 71 more horse power than 2008 Mazda 6. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Rover 75 (240 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 2006 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda 6 | 2006 Rover 75 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | 6 | 75 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 175 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 215 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.3 seconds | 8.8 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 9.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 65 L |