2008 Mazda 6 vs. 2008 Volvo C70
To start off, both 2008 Mazda 6 and 2008 Volvo C70 were released in the same year (2008). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 2,319 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volvo C70 (330 Nm) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 2008 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda 6 | 2008 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 6 | C70 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2319 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 330 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 90 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 240 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.3 seconds | 7.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 10.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 68 L |