2008 Mazda 6 vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 372 kg more than 2008 Mazda 6.

Because 2010 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm @ 5700 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 6. (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 6.

Compare all specifications:

2008 Mazda 6 2010 Cadillac CTS
Make Mazda Cadillac
Model 6 CTS
Year Released 2008 2010
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2260 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 0 HP 270 HP
Torque 207 Nm 302 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 5700 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1384 kg 1756 kg
Vehicle Length 4620 mm 4867 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1842 mm
Vehicle Height 1760 mm 1504 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 68 L