2008 Mazda 6 vs. 2010 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2010 Jeep Compass is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Compass (172 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2008 Mazda 6. (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Compass (223 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 6. (177 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2010 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda 6 | 2010 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Mazda | Jeep |
Model | 6 | Compass |
Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2400 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 172 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 177 Nm | 223 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1656 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2634 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 51 L |