2008 Mazda 6 vs. 2011 Chevrolet Epica
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 2,490 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet Epica (154 HP) has 50 more horse power than 2008 Mazda 6. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Epica should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Chevrolet Epica (237 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 2011 Chevrolet Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda 6 | 2011 Chevrolet Epica | |
Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
Model | 6 | Epica |
Year Released | 2008 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2490 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 237 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 89.2 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 208 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.3 seconds | 9.9 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 63 L |