2008 Mazda 6 vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 6 (118 HP) has 17 more horse power than 2012 Volvo C30. (101 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2012 Volvo C30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C30 weights approximately 95 kg more than 2008 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda 6 | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 6 | C30 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 101 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1356 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 60 L |