2008 Mazda 6 vs. 2013 Ford Expedition
To start off, 2013 Ford Expedition is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford Expedition is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Expedition (306 HP) has 202 more horse power than 2008 Mazda 6. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Expedition should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda 6.
Because 2013 Ford Expedition is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Expedition will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Expedition (495 Nm) has 350 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 2013 Ford Expedition will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda 6 | 2013 Ford Expedition | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | 6 | Expedition |
Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 306 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 495 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 105 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5245 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1961 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3023 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 106 L |