2008 Mazda B2300 vs. 1994 Plymouth Colt
To start off, 2008 Mazda B2300 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 2,266 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda B2300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda B2300 (144 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1994 Plymouth Colt. (112 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda B2300 should accelerate faster than 1994 Plymouth Colt.
Because 2008 Mazda B2300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Mazda B2300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Plymouth Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda B2300 (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Plymouth Colt. (157 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda B2300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Plymouth Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda B2300 | 1994 Plymouth Colt | |
Make | Mazda | Plymouth |
Model | B2300 | Colt |
Year Released | 2008 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2266 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 144 HP | 112 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2530 mm |