2008 Mazda B2300 vs. 2000 Proton 400
To start off, 2008 Mazda B2300 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Proton 400 would be higher. At 2,266 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda B2300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda B2300 (144 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2000 Proton 400. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda B2300 should accelerate faster than 2000 Proton 400.
Because 2008 Mazda B2300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Mazda B2300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Proton 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda B2300 (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Proton 400. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda B2300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mazda B2300 | 2000 Proton 400 | |
| Make | Mazda | Proton |
| Model | B2300 | 400 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2266 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 144 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2510 mm |
