2008 Mazda B2300 vs. 2000 Toyota Opa
To start off, 2008 Mazda B2300 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Opa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Opa would be higher. At 2,266 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda B2300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Opa (150 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2008 Mazda B2300. (144 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Opa should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda B2300.
Because 2008 Mazda B2300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Mazda B2300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Opa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda B2300 (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota Opa. (200 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda B2300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota Opa.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda B2300 | 2000 Toyota Opa | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | B2300 | Opa |
Year Released | 2008 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2266 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 144 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 60 L |