2008 Mazda B2300 vs. 2001 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Mazda B2300 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Rover 75 would be higher. At 2,266 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda B2300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda B2300 (144 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2001 Rover 75. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda B2300 should accelerate faster than 2001 Rover 75.
Because 2008 Mazda B2300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Mazda B2300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda B2300 (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Rover 75. (160 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda B2300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda B2300 | 2001 Rover 75 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | B2300 | 75 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2266 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 144 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2750 mm |