2008 Mazda CX-7 vs. 1986 Holden Astra
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Holden Astra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Holden Astra would be higher. At 2,258 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP) has 174 more horse power than 1986 Holden Astra. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1986 Holden Astra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda CX-7 weights approximately 336 kg more than 1986 Holden Astra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda CX-7 (350 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Holden Astra. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Holden Astra.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda CX-7 | 1986 Holden Astra | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | CX-7 | Astra |
Year Released | 2008 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2258 cc | 1486 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 244 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 350 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1191 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2420 mm |