2008 Mazda CX-7 vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander would be higher. At 2,343 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. (162 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 290 kg more than 2008 Mazda CX-7.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda CX-7 (351 Nm) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. (215 Nm). This means 2008 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda CX-7 | 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Mazda | Mitsubishi |
Model | CX-7 | Outlander |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 244 HP | 162 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 351 Nm | 215 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.4 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 100 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 69 L | 59 L |