2008 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1947 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,725 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (270 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 1947 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1947 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 301 kg more than 2008 Mazda CX-9.
Because 2008 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1947 Volvo PV 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1947 Volvo PV 60 has manual transmission. 1947 Volvo PV 60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda CX-9 | 1947 Volvo PV 60 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | CX-9 | PV 60 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1947 |
Engine Size | 3725 cc | 3670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1329 kg | 1630 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2850 mm |