2008 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 4,247 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk weights approximately 209 kg more than 2008 Mazda CX-9.
Because 2008 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk has manual transmission. 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda CX-9 | 1956 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Mazda | Studebaker |
Model | CX-9 | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 2008 | 1956 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3726 cc | 4247 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1191 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2980 mm |