2008 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1976 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (270 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1976 Toyota Mark II. (107 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1976 Toyota Mark II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Toyota Mark II weights approximately 15 kg more than 2008 Mazda CX-9.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (370 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Toyota Mark II. (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Toyota Mark II.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda CX-9 | 1976 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | CX-9 | Mark II |
Year Released | 2008 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3726 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 107 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 370 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2590 mm |