2008 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1981 Seat 127
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Seat 127. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Seat 127 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 1981 Seat 127. (47 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1981 Seat 127.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 303 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Seat 127. (63 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Seat 127.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mazda CX-9 | 1981 Seat 127 | |
| Make | Mazda | Seat |
| Model | CX-9 | 127 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3496 cc | 901 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 273 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 366 Nm | 63 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 3600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2230 mm |
