2008 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1982 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (271 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Celica. (119 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 149 kg more than 1982 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (370 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda CX-9 | 1982 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | CX-9 | Celica |
Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3726 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 370 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1329 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2640 mm |