2008 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1983 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (270 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. (57 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 90 kg more than 2008 Mazda CX-9.
Because 2008 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (370 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. (113 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda CX-9 | 1983 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | CX-9 | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2008 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3726 cc | 1950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 370 Nm | 113 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1270 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2560 mm |