2008 Mazda CX-9 vs. 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 9 kg more than 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mazda CX-9 | 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
| Model | CX-9 | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3726 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1329 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2680 mm |
